National Labor Relations Board v. Avon Convalescent Center, Inc.

Sixth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Avon Convalescent Center, Inc.

490 F.2d 1384

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 26, 1974

Docket73-1323

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 490 F.2d 1384 (National Labor Relations Board v. Avon Convalescent Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Avon Convalescent Center, Inc., 490 F.2d 1384 (6th Cir. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case the National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of an order previously issued against respondent Avon Convalescent Center, Inc. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 200 N.L.R.B. No. 99.

The record discloses that when employees of the Convalescent Center undertook organization of a union in early 1971, respondent met the challenge, as found by the Board on substantial evidence, by illegal surveillance, threats and discharges. We have reviewed the record and hold that the findings of fact of the Trial Examiner and the Board are not only supported by substantial evidence, they are compelled by it.

Enforcement of the Board’s order is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case the National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of an order previously issued against respondent Avon Convalescent Center, Inc. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 200 N.L.R.B. No. 99.

The record discloses that when employees of the Convalescent Center undertook organization of a union in early 1971, respondent met the challenge, as found by the Board on substantial evidence, by illegal surveillance, threats and discharges. We have reviewed the record and hold that the findings of fact of the Trial Examiner and the Board are not only supported by substantial evidence, they are compelled by it.

Enforcement of the Board’s order is granted.

Providence Alaska Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board, and Alaska Nurses Association and American Nurses Association, Respondents-Intervenors. National Labor Relations Board, and Alaska Nurses Association and American Nurses Association, Petitioners-Intervenors v. Providence Alaska Medical Center

121 F.3d 548 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

Providence Alaska Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

121 F.3d 548 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

Beverly California Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Cross-Applicant

970 F.2d 1548 (Sixth Circuit, 1992)

FMC Corp. v. Boesky

673 F. Supp. 242 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)

Beverly Enterprises, Dba Beverly Manor Convalescent Centers v. National Labor Relations Board

661 F.2d 1095 (Sixth Circuit, 1981)

National Labor Relations Board v. Avon Convalescent Center, Inc.

549 F.2d 1080 (Sixth Circuit, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

490 F.2d 1384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-avon-convalescent-center-inc-ca6-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack