National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.
This text of 315 U.S. 282 (National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon examination of the record, the Court concludes that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U. S. 584; Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Labor Board, 312 U. S. 660. The judgment is therefore reversed with directions to enforce the Board’s order in full, but with the modification proposed by the Board to conform to the decision in Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board, 311 U. S. *283 7. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Roberts are of opinion that the order as modified should be enforced except with respect to the alleged discriminatory discharges of Warner, Jr., and Jordan, which they think are without the support of substantial evidence.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
315 U.S. 282, 62 S. Ct. 608, 86 L. Ed. 848, 1942 U.S. LEXIS 1159, 9 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-automotive-maintenance-machinery-co-scotus-1942.