National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.

315 U.S. 282, 62 S. Ct. 608, 86 L. Ed. 848, 1942 U.S. LEXIS 1159, 9 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 415
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 16, 1942·No. 188·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon examination of the record, the Court concludes that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U. S. 584; Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Labor Board, 312 U. S. 660. The judgment is therefore reversed with directions to enforce the Board’s order in full, but with the modification proposed by the Board to conform to the decision in Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board, 311 U. S. *283 7. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Roberts are of opinion that the order as modified should be enforced except with respect to the alleged discriminatory discharges of Warner, Jr., and Jordan, which they think are without the support of substantial evidence.

Reversed.

Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co., 315 U.S. 282, 62 S. Ct. 608, 86 L. Ed. 848, 1942 U.S. LEXIS 1159, 9 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 415 (1942).

315 U.S. 282 (National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related