National Labor Relations Board v. Aubrey Eaton, Dba Eaton Warehousing Company

919 F.2d 141, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 24940, 1990 WL 191622
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 3, 1990
Docket90-6098
StatusUnpublished

This text of 919 F.2d 141 (National Labor Relations Board v. Aubrey Eaton, Dba Eaton Warehousing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Aubrey Eaton, Dba Eaton Warehousing Company, 919 F.2d 141, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 24940, 1990 WL 191622 (6th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

919 F.2d 141

135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3272

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
Aubrey EATON, dba Eaton Warehousing Company, Respondent.

No. 90-6098.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 3, 1990.

Before DAVID A. NELSON and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.

JUDGMENT

The National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") seeks enforcement of its decision in Case No. 9-CA-25955 finding the respondent committed unfair labor practices and ordering the respondent to take specified remedial steps to correct those practices. The respondent having failed to serve and file an answer to the Board's petition within 20 days as provided in Rule 15(b), Fed.R.App.P., the Board moves for entry of judgment by default.

Upon consideration, we conclude the Board is entitled to summary enforcement of its decision and order. Rule 15(b), Fed.R.App.P.

It therefore is ORDERED that the said decision and order of the Board is enforced and that the respondent, Aubrey Eaton, dba Eaton Warehousing Company, of Cincinnati, Ohio, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, abide by and perform the directions of the Board in such order contained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
919 F.2d 141, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 24940, 1990 WL 191622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-aubrey-eaton-dba-eaton-warehousing-ca6-1990.