National Labor Relations Board v. American Life and Accident Insurance Company of Kentucky

394 F.2d 616, 68 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2250, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6990
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 10, 1968
Docket17805_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 394 F.2d 616 (National Labor Relations Board v. American Life and Accident Insurance Company of Kentucky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. American Life and Accident Insurance Company of Kentucky, 394 F.2d 616, 68 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2250, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6990 (6th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

ORDER.

The National Labor Relations Board petitions this Court for enforcement of its order against American Life and Accident Insurance Company of Kentucky, Respondent. The Board found in a Decision and Order reported at 158 NLRB-(No. 31) (1966) that the Respondent violated Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (5) and (1), by refusing to bargain with the certified bargaining representative of a group of its employees. Respondent does not contest the fact of its refusal to bargain but contends that the unit covered by the certification was inappropriate, and therefore it was under no legal duty to bargain.

The power of this Court' to set aside the Board’s determination of an appropriate bargaining unit is a narrow one, limited to a determination of whether the Board has violated the proscriptions of Section 9(c) (5), 29 U.S.C. § 159(c) (5), by giving controlling weight to the extent of organization or has otherwise abused its discretion. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 330 F.2d 62 (6th Cir. 1964), vacated and remanded on other grounds 380 U.S. 525, 85 S.Ct. 1326, 14 L.Ed.2d 265 (1965). In the instant case the Board found that a grouping of Respondent’s Cleveland 1 and 2 offices, the only offices in the City of Cleveland, was an appropriate bargaining unit. In his decision the Trial Examiner articulated several bases for his ruling. See National Labor Relations Board v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 380 U.S. 438, 443 n. 6, 85 S.Ct. 1061, 13 L.Ed.2d 951 (1965). We cannot say that the Board gave controlling weight to the extent of union organization or otherwise abused its discretion.

Respondent’s contention that it was denied due process we find to be without substance. It is therefore ordered that the petition of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order be, and it is, hereby granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
394 F.2d 616, 68 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2250, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-american-life-and-accident-insurance-ca6-1968.