National Labor Relations Board v. American Directional Boring, Inc.

383 F. App'x 594
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2010·No. 09-1194·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board (the Board) has applied for enforcement of its Supplemental Decision and Order directing American Directional Boring, Inc. (ADB), to bargain with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 2, and granting other relief to remedy numerous unfair labor practices the Board found were committed by ADB in response to a union organizing effort. See 29 U.S.C. § 160(e). The Order was entered by two members of a three-member group to which the Board delegated all its powers in December 2007 pursuant to § 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 153(b). When the Order was entered on September 30, 2008, the five-member Board had only two members.

In New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 560 U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2635, 2644-45, *595 - L.Ed.2d- (June 17, 2010), the Supreme Court held that a two-member group may not exercise delegated authority when the total Board membership falls below three because “the delegation clause [in § 3(b) ] requires that a delegee group maintain a membership of three in order to exercise the delegated authority of the Board.” Accordingly, we deny the application for enforcement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. American Directional Boring, Inc., 383 F. App'x 594 (8th Cir. 2010).

383 F. App'x 594 (National Labor Relations Board v. American Directional Boring, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Labor Relations Board v. Whitesell Corp.
638 F.3d 883 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)