National Labor Relations Board v. Aero Engineering Corporation

Fifth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Aero Engineering Corporation

433 F.2d 1311

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 16, 1971

Docket29614

StatusPublished

This text of 433 F.2d 1311 (National Labor Relations Board v. Aero Engineering Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Labor Relations Board v. Aero Engineering Corporation, 433 F.2d 1311 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board made findings that the respondent, Aero Engineering Corporation, was in violation of section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act for refusing to bargain with a union which it found to represent a group of the respondent’s employees. The Board entered an order directing the respondent to cease and desist from violations of the Act, to bargain when requested, and to post appropriate notices. The Board seeks enforcement of its order. There is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to sustain the Board’s findings and the law requires that its order be enforced. A discussion of the facts and of the pertinent law would not serve as an aid to the decision of future controversies. The order of the Board will be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board made findings that the respondent, Aero Engineering Corporation, was in violation of section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act for refusing to bargain with a union which it found to represent a group of the respondent’s employees. The Board entered an order directing the respondent to cease and desist from violations of the Act, to bargain when requested, and to post appropriate notices. The Board seeks enforcement of its order. There is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to sustain the Board’s findings and the law requires that its order be enforced. A discussion of the facts and of the pertinent law would not serve as an aid to the decision of future controversies. The order of the Board will be enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

433 F.2d 1311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-aero-engineering-corporation-ca5-1971.