National Heritage Foundation v. Jonathan Miller

599 F. App'x 107
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 8, 2015·No. 14-1541, 14-1543, 14-1576·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John R. Behrmann, Nancy Behrmann, and their attorneys, Jonathan Miller, Nye Peabody, Stirling, Hale and Miller, LLP, and Daniel Joseph Schendzielos, Schend-zielos & Associates, LLC, appeal from the district court’s order affirming the orders of the bankruptcy court denying the Behrmanns’ motion for leave to pursue litigation against the directors and officers of the Debtor, National Heritage Foundation, Incorporated, and granting National Heritage Foundation’s motion for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. National Heritage Found., Inc. v. Miller, 510 B.R. 526 (E.D.Va.2014). Although we deny National Heritage Foundation’s motion to strike the Appellants’ Reply brief, we grant the motion to submit these appeals on the briefs and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this *108 court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Heritage Foundation v. Jonathan Miller, 599 F. App'x 107 (4th Cir. 2015).

599 F. App'x 107 (National Heritage Foundation v. Jonathan Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related