National Hairdressers'& Cosmetologists'association v. Philad Company
This text of 129 F.2d 1020 (National Hairdressers'& Cosmetologists'association v. Philad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NATIONAL HAIRDRESSERS' & COSMETOLOGISTS' ASSOCIATION, Inc., et al.
v.
The PHILAD COMPANY, Appellant.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
A. J. Hudson, of Cleveland, Ohio (Herbert L. Cohen, of Wilmington, Del., and J. T. Hoffmann, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.
*1021 George B. Finnegan, Jr., of New York City (E. Ennalls Berl, of Wilmington, Del., and Hobart N. Durham, of New York City, on the brief), for appellees.
Before MARIS and JONES, Circuit Judges and SMITH, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The decree of the district court is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Biggs, 41 F.Supp. 701.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 F.2d 1020, 54 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 512, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-hairdressers-cosmetologistsassociation-v-philad-company-ca3-1942.