National Grange Mutual Insurance v. Savage
This text of 158 A.D.2d 523 (National Grange Mutual Insurance v. Savage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal calls upon us to review the evidence presented [524]*524with respect to the petitioning insurance company’s application to stay arbitration of the respondent’s uninsured motorist claim. The minutes of the hearing indicate that the only evidence proffered by the respondent, Sylvester Savage, as proof of the noninsurance of the offending vehicle, was a statement allegedly made to him by the driver of that vehicle, one Raymond Bernard, to the effect that he had no insurance. This testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay and was not competent proof of Bernard’s lack of insurance (see, Matter of Rosen [MVAIC], 20 AD2d 704; see also, Levins v Bucholtz, 2 AD2d 351). The insurance company, on the other hand, produced documents which indicated that Bernard was insured at the time of the accident by the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company. Mr. Savage did not rebut the insurance company’s proof. Accordingly, arbitration of his uninsured motorist claim is permanently stayed. Mollen, P. J., Eiber, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 A.D.2d 523, 551 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-grange-mutual-insurance-v-savage-nyappdiv-1990.