National Grange Mutual Insurance v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

National Grange Mutual Insurance v. Rivera

228 A.D.2d 603, 644 N.Y.2d 628, 644 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7152

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 17, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D.2d 603 (National Grange Mutual Insurance v. Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Grange Mutual Insurance v. Rivera, 228 A.D.2d 603, 644 N.Y.2d 628, 644 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7152 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

The evidence adduced at the hearing was sufficient to establish that the bill sent to the insured strictly complied with the billing procedures set forth by the Rules of New York Automo[604]*604bile Insurance Plan § 14 (E) (2) (cf., Matter of Home Indem. Co. v Scricca, 147 AD2d 697; Eveready Ins. Co. v Mitchell, 133 AD2d 210). Moreover, the evidence was also sufficient to establish mailing of the bill in question (cf., Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Ramirez, 208 AD2d 828; L.Z.R. Raphaely Galleries v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 191 AD2d 680). Accordingly, the policy was effectively cancelled and the Supreme Court properly granted the petition to stay arbitration. Rosenblatt, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The evidence adduced at the hearing was sufficient to establish that the bill sent to the insured strictly complied with the billing procedures set forth by the Rules of New York Automo[604]*604bile Insurance Plan § 14 (E) (2) (cf., Matter of Home Indem. Co. v Scricca, 147 AD2d 697; Eveready Ins. Co. v Mitchell, 133 AD2d 210). Moreover, the evidence was also sufficient to establish mailing of the bill in question (cf., Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Ramirez, 208 AD2d 828; L.Z.R. Raphaely Galleries v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 191 AD2d 680). Accordingly, the policy was effectively cancelled and the Supreme Court properly granted the petition to stay arbitration. Rosenblatt, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 A.D.2d 603, 644 N.Y.2d 628, 644 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-grange-mutual-insurance-v-rivera-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack