National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. Kovalchick Corp.

74 Pa. D. & C.4th 22, 2005 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 93
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Jefferson County
DecidedSeptember 15, 2005
Docketnos. 202-2004 CD, 203-2004 CD, 204-2004 CD, 312-2004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 Pa. D. & C.4th 22 (National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. Kovalchick Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Jefferson County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. Kovalchick Corp., 74 Pa. D. & C.4th 22, 2005 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 93 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2005).

Opinion

FORADORA, P.J,

[24]*24INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Before this court is a matter of first impression in Pennsylvania — whether a for-profit corporation operating natural gas lines has the power under 15 Pa.C.S. §1511 to condemn privately owned property for its gathering lines.

National Fuel Gas Supply and Kovalchick Corporation seek a judgment concerning whether National has the power to condemn portions of Kovalchick’s property which support three of National’s pipelines. Originally, National filed three applications for approval of bond under the authority of 15 Pa.C.S. § § 1103 and 1511 to perfect the condemnation of three natural gas pipeline rights-of-way across strips of land owned by Kovalchick. Kovalchick challenged National’s condemnation authority in an equity action. This court consolidated the three applications with the equity action and conducted a nonjuiy trial. Now, after careful consideration of the evidence and the parties’ briefs, the court will enter judgment in favor of National, who possesses and may exercise condemnation powers with regard to the rights-of-way supporting lines G-102, G-110, and FM-100.

FACTUAL FINDINGS

Kovalchick, a private, family-owned business, owns a strip of land formerly owned by the Pittsburgh & Shawmut Railroad Company (P&S Railroad) and located in Warsaw, Pinecreek, and Snyder Townships in Jefferson County, Pennsylvania. P&S Railroad completed the following grants of license and right-of-way agreements: (1) to Jackson Vitrified China Company on August 1, 1929, for constructing, operating, and maintaining a four-[25]*25inch natural gas pipeline under and through P&S Railroad property in Warsaw Township; (2) to Lee B. Humphrey t/d/a Humphrey Brick & Tile on November 20, 1931, for constructing, operating and maintaining a six-inch natural gas pipeline under and through P&S Railroad property in Pinecreek Township; (3) and to United Natural Gas Company on September 15, 1953, for constructing, operating and maintaining a 12-inch natural gas pipeline under and through P&S Railroad property in Snyder Township. National is the undisputed successor-in-interest to each of those licenses and rights-of-way.

National is a local producer primarily engaged in exploring, drilling and producing local natural gas. The corporation gathers, stores, transmits and transports natural gas through its 2,910 miles of pipeline extending from the Canadian gateway at Niagara, south to the Ellisburg-Leidy hub, and west to the Appalachian Basin. Three of those lines are currently in dispute for purposes of this consolidated action: G-102; G-110; and FM-100. Lines G-102 and G-l 10 are located entirely within the borders of Jefferson County and are used to receive and gather gas from local producers in Jefferson County. National transports the gas from lines G-102 and G-110 on behalf of shippers to delivery points in New York and Pennsylvania and utilizes those lines to deliver gas to local distributor National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation for sale to retail customers. Through lines G-102 and G-110, National services 123 customers, including the local airport. Whereas G-102 and G-110 function as gathering lines, however, line FM-100 is an interstate transmission line. National also owns or co-owns 32 underground natural storage areas.

[26]*26National possesses a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The FERC regulates National as a public utility involved in the gathering, storage and interstate transportation of natural gas.1 The FERC regulates the construction, acquisition, operation and abandonment of National’s facilities in the interstate transportation of gas, as well as the provisions, rates, terms and abandonment of National’s interstate transportation services. Gathering lines G-102 and G-110 are exempt from regulation under the Natural Gas Act (NGA),2 and thus are not subject to the FERC’s requirements concerning the acquisition, construction, operation and abandonment of facilities. Nonetheless, because both lines provide transportation services associated with interstate commerce, all of National’s transportation obligations through them — rates, terms, and conditions of service — are governed by FERC regulations.3 National must, for instance, provide non-discriminatory access through lines G-102 and G-110 and, absent the consent of affected shippers, receive FERC authorization before removing firm gas receipt and delivery points from its service agreements.

Unlike G-102 and G-110, interstate transmission line FM-100 is encompassed within National’s certificates of public necessity and convenience, is fully regulated [27]*27by the FERC in all respects, and thus constitutes a “jurisdictional facility” controlled by the FERC under its general jurisdiction.

DISCUSSION

15 Pa.C.S. §1511 reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

“(a) General rule. — A public utility corporation shall, in addition to any other power of eminent domain conferred by any other statute, have the right to take, occupy and condemn property for one or more of the following principle purposes and ancillary purposes reasonably necessary or appropriate for the accomplishment of the principle purposes:...
“(3) the production, generation, manufacture, transmission, storage, distribution or furnishing of natural gas ... to or for the public.” Id.

A public utility corporation is defined by statute as any foreign or domestic corporation for profit that is subject to regulation by either the Pennsylvania Utility Commission or an officer or agency of the United States. Section 1103.

Under Pennsylvania law, courts must read unambiguous statutes “[according to] their plain meaning and common usage,” Nott v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare, 68 D.&C.4th 495, 503 (2004), and give effect to that plain meaning. Erdely v. Hinchcliffe and Keener Inc., 875 A.2d 1078, 1085 (Pa. Super. 2005). Section 1511 is unambiguous; it plainly states that a public utility corporation may condemn property for any or all of the purposes listed in subsection (a)(3). The list appears to be comprehensive, especially when considered with its natural inferences. Though the word “gathering” does not specifically ap[28]*28pear, National could neither store nor distribute natural gas without first gathering it. Even absent that inference, however, section 1511 specifies that condemnation is available both for the purposes enumerated in the statute and for ancillary purposes reasonably necessary or appropriate to accomplish the enumerated purposes. Gathering doubtless constitutes such an ancillary purpose and is thus encompassed within the statute.

Equally clear is National’s status as a public utility corporation under section 1103. National operates as a for-profit corporation engaged in the international transportation of natural gas. As such, National is necessarily subject to NGA requirements and consequent regulation by the FERC — an agency of the United States. This includes the regulation of certain aspects of gathering activities relating to the interstate transportation of natural gas. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. FERC, 929 F.2d 1261 (8th Cir.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 Pa. D. & C.4th 22, 2005 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-fuel-gas-supply-corp-v-kovalchick-corp-pactcompljeffer-2005.