National Folding Box & Paper Co. v. Robertson

Second Circuit

National Folding Box & Paper Co. v. Robertson

104 F. 552, 44 C.C.A. 29, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3947

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedOctober 24, 1900

DocketNo. 41

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 104 F. 552 (National Folding Box & Paper Co. v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Folding Box & Paper Co. v. Robertson, 104 F. 552, 44 C.C.A. 29, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3947 (2d Cir. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal taken from an order enjoining defendants pendente lite in a suit for infringing letters patent. The ground of the application is that the patent in suit expired by limitation, October 9,1900. Precisely the same point was raised in the circuit court of appeals for the First circuit. Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co. v. Municipal Signal Co., 9 C. C. A. 450, 61 Fed. 208. That court held that, in view of the expiration of the patent, the interlocutory injunction appealed from terminated, and that there was therefore “nothing remaining for a judgment of [553]*553this court to act upon. In this condition of the cause the court will no further consider whether the injunction was or was not properly granted, but will dismiss the appeal.” in (his expression of opinion we entirely concur. The motion is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CURIAM.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal taken from an order enjoining defendants pendente lite in a suit for infringing letters patent. The ground of the application is that the patent in suit expired by limitation, October 9,1900. Precisely the same point was raised in the circuit court of appeals for the First circuit. Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co. v. Municipal Signal Co., 9 C. C. A. 450, 61 Fed. 208. That court held that, in view of the expiration of the patent, the interlocutory injunction appealed from terminated, and that there was therefore “nothing remaining for a judgment of [553]*553this court to act upon. In this condition of the cause the court will no further consider whether the injunction was or was not properly granted, but will dismiss the appeal.” in (his expression of opinion we entirely concur. The motion is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 F. 552, 44 C.C.A. 29, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-folding-box-paper-co-v-robertson-ca2-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack