National Fire Proofing Co. v. Mial

Supreme Court of New Jersey

National Fire Proofing Co. v. Mial

90 A. 317, 86 N.J.L. 360, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 269

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 16, 1914·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for . the reasons firstly and secondly expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chancellor in tile case of Davis v. Mial, at the present term of this court, ante p. 167.

For affirmance — Tite Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaltsch, Bogert, Yredenbuegi-i, Congdon, Teri-iunE, Heppeni-ieimer, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for . the reasons firstly and secondly expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chancellor in tile case of Davis v. Mial, at the present term of this court, ante p. 167.

For affirmance — Tite Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaltsch, Bogert, Yredenbuegi-i, Congdon, Teri-iunE, Heppeni-ieimer, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Hone.

National Fire Proofing Co. v. Mial, 90 A. 317, 86 N.J.L. 360, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 269 (N.J. 1914).

Pincite

90 A. 317 (National Fire Proofing Co. v. Mial) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.