National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford v. CE Design
This text of National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford v. CE Design (National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford v. CE Design) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered June 25, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00720-CV
NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, ET AL., Appellants
V.
CE DESIGN, ET AL., Appellees
On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11-14467
ORDER In a letter dated May 30, 2013, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over the appeal
because it appeared the notice of appeal was untimely. In response, appellants informed the
Court that they had filed a Rule 306a motion in the trial court and that a hearing on their motion
was scheduled in the trial court on June 19, 2013. By order signed on June 19, 2013, the trial
court granted the motion and made a finding that appellants first received actual knowledge of
the order granting appellees’ special appearance on April 29, 2013. Thus, it now appears that
appellants’ May 17, 2013 notice of appeal was timely. However, appellants must file a
supplemental clerk’s record, WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER,
containing the trial court’s June 19, 2013 order. On June 7, 2013, appellants filed an opposed motion to abate this appeal pending
resolution of its Rule 306a motion in the trial court. Because it appears this issue has been
resolved, we DENY the motion to abate.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford v. CE Design, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-fire-insurance-company-of-hartford-v-ce-d-texapp-2013.