National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
565 U.S. 1033
Opinion
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted. In addition to Question 1 presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “Whether the suit brought by respondents to challenge the minimum coverage provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 26 U. S. C. § 5000A, is barred by the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U. S. C. § 7421(a).” A total of two hours is allotted for oral argument on Question 1 and one hour on the additional question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 565 U.S. 1033 (2011).
565 U.S. 1033 (National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Requirement to maintain minimum essential coverage
26 U.S.C. § 5000A
Prohibition of suits to restrain assessment or collection
26 U.S.C. § 7421(a)