National Equity Recovery Services, Inc. v. R.O.G. Investment, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

National Equity Recovery Services, Inc. v. R.O.G. Investment, Inc.

965 So. 2d 230, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13862, 2007 WL 2480537

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 5, 2007

DocketNo. 3D06-1116

StatusPublished

This text of 965 So. 2d 230 (National Equity Recovery Services, Inc. v. R.O.G. Investment, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Equity Recovery Services, Inc. v. R.O.G. Investment, Inc., 965 So. 2d 230, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13862, 2007 WL 2480537 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

National Equity Recovery Services, Inc. appeals the denial of its motion for leave to intervene and to disburse excess funds in the underlying mortgage foreclosure action. We are compelled to reverse because there is no appearance in this Court on behalf of parties R.O.G. Investments, Inc., Marvin Hall, and Idriana Rodriguez, and the trial court in this case summarily denied the motion to intervene without the benefit of any argument from counsel or the introduction of any evidence. See [231]*231Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1980)(abuse of discretion lies where a judicial action appears arbitrary and unreasonable); Barnhill v. Florida Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation, 905 So.2d 195, 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)(abuse of discretion standard governs a review of the denial of a motion to intervene).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

National Equity Recovery Services, Inc. appeals the denial of its motion for leave to intervene and to disburse excess funds in the underlying mortgage foreclosure action. We are compelled to reverse because there is no appearance in this Court on behalf of parties R.O.G. Investments, Inc., Marvin Hall, and Idriana Rodriguez, and the trial court in this case summarily denied the motion to intervene without the benefit of any argument from counsel or the introduction of any evidence. See [231]*231Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1980)(abuse of discretion lies where a judicial action appears arbitrary and unreasonable); Barnhill v. Florida Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation, 905 So.2d 195, 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)(abuse of discretion standard governs a review of the denial of a motion to intervene).

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

965 So. 2d 230, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13862, 2007 WL 2480537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-equity-recovery-services-inc-v-rog-investment-inc-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack