National Equipment Co. v. United States

Court of Claims

National Equipment Co. v. United States

39 F.2d 757, 69 Ct. Cl. 549, 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 10612, 1930 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 480, 1930 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9262

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedApril 7, 1930

DocketNo. J-83

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 F.2d 757 (National Equipment Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Equipment Co. v. United States, 39 F.2d 757, 69 Ct. Cl. 549, 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 10612, 1930 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 480, 1930 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9262 (cc 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

LITTLETON, Judge.

The question involved in this ease is the same as that decided by the court in Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc., v. United States (Ct. Cl.) 37 F.(2d) 965, decided February 10, 1930.

The plaintiff contends that it is entitled to recover $20,638.87 as interest on the over-payments set forth in the findings of fact from the dates on which the overpayments were made to the date of the assessment of the additional tax for 1917, 1918, and 1919 against which the overpayments were applied as credits.

The question is governed by the opinion of the court in Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc., v. United States, supra, and, for the reasons stated in that ease, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover. The petition must therefore be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

BOOTH, Chief Justice, and WILLIAMS,, and GREEN, Judges, concur.

GRAHAM, Judge, concurs in view of the previous decisions of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI