National Dredging Co. v. Mundy
This text of 26 A. 386 (National Dredging Co. v. Mundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There appears to be nothing in either of the fourteen specifications of error that requires a reversal of the judgment entered on the verdict. We are not convinced that there was any error in the admission or exclusion of testimony, or in any of the learned judge’s rulings on questions of law. The questions of fact presented by the evidence were exclusively for the consideration of the jury, and, to them, they were submitted with instructions of which defendants have no just reason to complain.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A. 386, 155 Pa. 233, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-dredging-co-v-mundy-pa-1893.