National Dime Bank of Shamokin v. First Nat. Bank of Mt. Carmel

Third Circuit

National Dime Bank of Shamokin v. First Nat. Bank of Mt. Carmel

89 F.2d 51, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3382

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 12, 1937

DocketNo. 6225

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 F.2d 51 (National Dime Bank of Shamokin v. First Nat. Bank of Mt. Carmel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Dime Bank of Shamokin v. First Nat. Bank of Mt. Carmel, 89 F.2d 51, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3382 (3d Cir. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This bankrupt case involves no principle or precedent but simple questions of [52]*52fact. Those facts are stated at length in the exhaustive report by the referee and the comprehensive review thereof by the court below in its opinion. Reference to such report and opinion obviates a third restatement by "this court.

It suffices to say that after a detailed study of the proofs and of all questions involved, we find ourselves in accord with the judge below that “the referee had ample facts on which to reach his conclusions and on which to base his findings that the transfers by the bankrupt were made to secure a pre-existing indebtedness and not for any present or new consideration, and that the bank had reasonable cause to believe that preferences would be affected by such transfers.”

So regarding, its decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This bankrupt case involves no principle or precedent but simple questions of [52]*52fact. Those facts are stated at length in the exhaustive report by the referee and the comprehensive review thereof by the court below in its opinion. Reference to such report and opinion obviates a third restatement by "this court.

It suffices to say that after a detailed study of the proofs and of all questions involved, we find ourselves in accord with the judge below that “the referee had ample facts on which to reach his conclusions and on which to base his findings that the transfers by the bankrupt were made to secure a pre-existing indebtedness and not for any present or new consideration, and that the bank had reasonable cause to believe that preferences would be affected by such transfers.”

So regarding, its decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 F.2d 51, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-dime-bank-of-shamokin-v-first-nat-bank-of-mt-carmel-ca3-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack