National City Mtge. Co. v. Wercberger
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 04489 (National City Mtge. Co. v. Wercberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
National City Mtge. Co. v Wercberger (2025 NY Slip Op 04489)
| National City Mtge. Co. v Wercberger |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 04489 |
| Decided on July 30, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on July 30, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
LILLIAN WAN
DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.
2023-08635
(Index No. 15409/07)
v
Joel Wercberger, et al., defendants; Berish Welz, intervenor- appellant.
New York Litigation Group, PLLC, Rochester, NY (Austin T. Shufelt of counsel), for intervenor-appellant.
McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC, New York, NY (Aleksandr Altshuler and Mikelle V. Bliss of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the intervenor, Berish Welz, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lawrence Knipel, J.), dated September 7, 2023. The order denied the motion of the intervenor to fix the amount of an undertaking for a stay pursuant to CPLR 5519(a)(6) pending the determination of an appeal from an order and judgment of foreclosure and sale (one paper) of the same court dated November 4, 2022.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On the day of a scheduled foreclosure sale, the intervenor, Berish Welz, moved to fix the amount of an undertaking for a stay pursuant to CPLR 5519(a)(6) pending this Court's determination of an appeal from an order and judgment of foreclosure and sale dated November 4, 2022. The Supreme Court denied the motion on the ground that the foreclosure sale had already taken place. The intervenor appeals.
The intervenor's contention that the foreclosure sale should have been stayed pending the determination of the appeal from the order and judgment of foreclosure and sale was rendered academic since the foreclosure sale took place before the motion to fix the amount of an undertaking was heard (see Bank of N.Y. Mellon v Lewis, 200 AD3d 970, 971). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion to fix the amount of an undertaking.
BARROS, J.P., IANNACCI, WAN and GOLIA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 04489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-city-mtge-co-v-wercberger-nyappdiv-2025.