National City Bank v. Piluso
This text of 258 A.D. 915 (National City Bank v. Piluso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cross-appeals by plaintiff and defendants from a resettled order granting plaintiff’s motion to set aside a jury’s verdict and denying plaintiff’s motions to strike out the affirmative defenses in the answer and for a directed verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for. The action was brought on a promissory note, and the defense was based on plaintiff’s breach of an alleged agreement to sell the collateral security and credit defendants with the proceeds. Resettled order, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Defendants’ appeal from the original order dismissed, without costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 915, 17 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-city-bank-v-piluso-nyappdiv-1939.