National City Bank of New York v. Gelfert

New York Court of Appeals

National City Bank of New York v. Gelfert

35 N.E.2d 923, 286 N.Y. 569, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 2110

DecidedJune 5, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 35 N.E.2d 923 (National City Bank of New York v. Gelfert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National City Bank of New York v. Gelfert, 35 N.E.2d 923, 286 N.Y. 569, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 2110 (N.Y. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for reargument granted. As interpreted by us, the order of the Special Term determined only the proposition that section 1083 of the Civil Practice Act, as amended by chapter 510 of the Laws of 1938, could not be constitutionally applied to mortgage contracts made prior to its enactment. Hence the reargument must be limited to the single question whether the plaintiff made application for a deficiency judgment under section 1083. (See 284 N. Y. 13.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument granted. As interpreted by us, the order of the Special Term determined only the proposition that section 1083 of the Civil Practice Act, as amended by chapter 510 of the Laws of 1938, could not be constitutionally applied to mortgage contracts made prior to its enactment. Hence the reargument must be limited to the single question whether the plaintiff made application for a deficiency judgment under section 1083. (See 284 N. Y. 13.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 N.E.2d 923, 286 N.Y. 569, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 2110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-city-bank-of-new-york-v-gelfert-ny-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack