National Cash Register Co. v. Midway City Creamery Co.
Opinion
The tenth, eleventh and twelfth specifications allege error upon the ground that the court instructed the jury that, having deliberated over twelve hours, ten or more jurors were competent to return a verdict. The instruction and the verdict are deemed excepted to §§ 7621 and 7653, Comp. Laws, 1913. These specifications raise the objection that chapter 333, Sess. Laws, 1923, purporting to dispense with the requirements of uniformity in civil cases, is unconstitutional and void. This court has recently held in the case of Power v. Williams, ante, 54, 205 N. W. 9, that the act authorizing less than twelve jurors to return a valid verdict is unconstitutional, contravening section seven of the Bill of Rights of the state Constitution. The decision in that case is necessarily controlling and requires a reversal of the judgment and a new trial.
Other errors are assigned, but we need not consider them, as they may not arise upon another trial.
The judgment of the trial court is reversed and a new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
205 N.W. 624 (National Cash Register Co. v. Midway City Creamery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.