National Carloading Corp. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 438
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in National Carloading Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Cust. Ct. 531
United States Customs Court·Decided December 29, 1958·No. Reap. Dec. 9285; Entry No. 771240·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated - appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff, and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that — •

The submission for decision of any ease shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which, attaches to the decision of the [439]*439appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Carloading Corp. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 438 (cusc 1958).

42 Cust. Ct. 438 (National Carloading Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.