National Carbon Co. v. Beebe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

National Carbon Co. v. Beebe

275 A.D.2d 1068

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 1068 (National Carbon Co. v. Beebe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Carbon Co. v. Beebe, 275 A.D.2d 1068 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum: The proceeding is [1069]*1069a special proceeding in a civil action. (People ex rel. Negus v. Dwyer, 90 N. Y. 402; Eastern Concrete Steel Co. v. Bricklayers’ & Plasterers’ Int. Union, Local No. 45, 200 App. Div. 714; Matter of Hanbury, 160 App. Div. 662; People ex rel. Supreme Court v. Albertson, 242 App. Div. 450; Matter of Douglas v. Adel, 269 N. Y. 144.) The Trial Justice properly charged the jury that a verdict of not less than five sixths of the jurymen constituting the jury, would constitute the verdict of the jury. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 463-a.) We have considered the other points raised by the appellants and find no error. All concur. (The order convicts defendants of criminal contempt of court.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCum, Love, Kimball and Piper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: The proceeding is [1069]*1069a special proceeding in a civil action. (People ex rel. Negus v. Dwyer, 90 N. Y. 402; Eastern Concrete Steel Co. v. Bricklayers’ & Plasterers’ Int. Union, Local No. 45, 200 App. Div. 714; Matter of Hanbury, 160 App. Div. 662; People ex rel. Supreme Court v. Albertson, 242 App. Div. 450; Matter of Douglas v. Adel, 269 N. Y. 144.) The Trial Justice properly charged the jury that a verdict of not less than five sixths of the jurymen constituting the jury, would constitute the verdict of the jury. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 463-a.) We have considered the other points raised by the appellants and find no error. All concur. (The order convicts defendants of criminal contempt of court.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCum, Love, Kimball and Piper, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 1068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-carbon-co-v-beebe-nyappdiv-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack