National Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Dade County

419 So. 2d 697, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21145
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 7, 1982
DocketNo. 82-891
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 419 So. 2d 697 (National Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Dade County, 419 So. 2d 697, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21145 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, National Bulk Carriers (NBC), seeks certiorari review of an order of the Dade County Circuit Court rendered in its appellate capacity. The order, which affirmed, without prejudice to NBC to file a separate inverse condemnation action, the decision of the Dade County Board of Commissioners (Board) to deny NBC’s application for a dredge and fill permit and grant the County’s application to downzone the property from “heavy industrial” to “open space,” states:

The denial by the Appellees of the application for an unusual use permit for excavation and filling of Appellant[’]s property was correct; as was the granting of the application for a district boundary change filed by the County’s professional staff. Both actions are affirmed. However, nothing in the County’s action approved here or in this opinion shall be construed as a denial of the Appellant’s right to claim, in a separate action, that the actions taken by the County constituted a taking of Appellant’s property for a public purpose without compensation.

We have jurisdiction. Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(b)(2)(B).

Based upon careful examination of the briefs, record and argument in this case, we agree with the parties that the Circuit Court departed from the essential requirements of law in failing to rule on the inverse condemnation issue. Section 373.-617(2), Florida Statutes (1981), provides that circuit court review of agency action with respect to a permit “shall be confined solely to determining whether final agency action is an unreasonable exercise of the state’s police power constituting a taking without just compensation.” See also Kasser v. Dade County, 344 So.2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). As the proper forum for resolution of this issue, the Circuit Court erred [698]*698in requiring NBC to file a separate action. Accordingly, we grant the writ, quash that portion of the order allowing NBC to maintain a separate action, and remand the case to the Circuit Court for a determination of whether the Board’s action constitutes a taking without just compensation. Sec. 373.617(3), Pla.Stat. If the court so determines, it shall remand the matter to the Board for further action in accordance with section 373.617(3). The remainder of the Circuit Court’s order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dade County v. National Bulk Carriers, Inc.
450 So. 2d 213 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 So. 2d 697, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bulk-carriers-inc-v-dade-county-fladistctapp-1982.