National Broadway Bank v. Swift

13 N.Y.S. 526, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 997, 59 Hun 624, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1553
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 11, 1891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the points of the respondent demonstrate beyond question that the answer which was stricken out as frivolous was not subject to that criticism. The order appealed from has been argued by him precisely the same as though it came before this court upon a demurrer, and the question involved is certainly not so clear in favor of the respondent as to justify the court in striking out the answer as frivolous. The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Broadway Bank v. Swift, 13 N.Y.S. 526, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 997, 59 Hun 624, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1553 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

13 N.Y.S. 526 (National Broadway Bank v. Swift) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

German Exch. Bank v. New Jersey & S. D. Brewing Co.
34 N.Y.S. 133 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)