National Biscuit Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

National Biscuit Co. v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 397, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 416

United States Customs Court·Decided April 3, 1951·No. No. 55424; protest 152036-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From the testimony it appeared that the imported parts are not designed for or used in foodrgrinding or food-cutting machines, but, on the contrary, are used exclusively as repair parts for dough-mixing machinery and perform no cutting operation whatsoever." At the close of the hearing, counsel for the Government conceded that, if " the merchandise were presently imported it would be advisorily classified" as claimed by the plaintiff. From the record before the court the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From the testimony it appeared that the imported parts are not designed for or used in foodrgrinding or food-cutting machines, but, on the contrary, are used exclusively as repair parts for dough-mixing machinery and perform no cutting operation whatsoever." At the close of the hearing, counsel for the Government conceded that, if " the merchandise were presently imported it would be advisorily classified" as claimed by the plaintiff. From the record before the court the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

National Biscuit Co. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 397, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 416 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

26 Cust. Ct. 397 (National Biscuit Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.