National Biscuit Co. v. Hoey

80 F.2d 1016, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 173, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3337, 17 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 173
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 17, 1936
DocketNo. 195
StatusPublished

This text of 80 F.2d 1016 (National Biscuit Co. v. Hoey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Biscuit Co. v. Hoey, 80 F.2d 1016, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 173, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3337, 17 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 173 (2d Cir. 1936).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded to the District Court, with directions to enter a decree enjoining collection of the tax. An appropriate order shall be entered directing the repayment to the plaintiff of any cash, bonds, or funds which have been impounded or deposited below. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., v. Fontenot, 56 S.Ct. 374, 80 L.Ed. -, January 13, 1936.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. Fontenot
297 U.S. 110 (Supreme Court, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 F.2d 1016, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 173, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3337, 17 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-biscuit-co-v-hoey-ca2-1936.