National Bible Knowledge Association, Inc. v. Dumont Broadcasting Corporation

D.C. Circuit

National Bible Knowledge Association, Inc. v. Dumont Broadcasting Corporation

239 F.2d 74, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 254, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4133

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 29, 1956

Docket13430

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 239 F.2d 74 (National Bible Knowledge Association, Inc. v. Dumont Broadcasting Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Bible Knowledge Association, Inc. v. Dumont Broadcasting Corporation, 239 F.2d 74, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 254, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4133 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is from an order of the District Court denying plaintiff’s motion there for a preliminary injunction. The injunction was sought on the basis of a complaint that defendant, appellee, in essence was attempting unlawfully to cancel a contract under which it was televising certain programs of plaintiff. Damages also were prayed. On oral argument before us appellant’s counsel stated that the contract had expired, as also appears clearly from the record. He also represented that appellant asserts no claim of a present right to have its programs televised by appellee, under the contract or otherwise. Thus it appears that the appeal is moot and that any remaining controversy has to do-only with the question of damages, which has not been decided by the District Court. The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed as moot. In addition, the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which the District Court rested its denial of the motion for a preliminary injunction will be set aside, and the case remanded for such further proceedings as may be appropriate. Cf. Amalgamated Ass’n, etc., Motor Coach Employees v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 340 U.S. 416, 71 S.Ct. 373, 95 L.Ed. 389. 1

It is so ordered.

1

. The reason the findings of fact and conclusions of law are set aside is that we are unable to review them due to themootness of the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is from an order of the District Court denying plaintiff’s motion there for a preliminary injunction. The injunction was sought on the basis of a complaint that defendant, appellee, in essence was attempting unlawfully to cancel a contract under which it was televising certain programs of plaintiff. Damages also were prayed. On oral argument before us appellant’s counsel stated that the contract had expired, as also appears clearly from the record. He also represented that appellant asserts no claim of a present right to have its programs televised by appellee, under the contract or otherwise. Thus it appears that the appeal is moot and that any remaining controversy has to do-only with the question of damages, which has not been decided by the District Court. The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed as moot. In addition, the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which the District Court rested its denial of the motion for a preliminary injunction will be set aside, and the case remanded for such further proceedings as may be appropriate. Cf. Amalgamated Ass’n, etc., Motor Coach Employees v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 340 U.S. 416, 71 S.Ct. 373, 95 L.Ed. 389. 1

It is so ordered.

1

. The reason the findings of fact and conclusions of law are set aside is that we are unable to review them due to themootness of the appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 F.2d 74, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 254, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bible-knowledge-association-inc-v-dumont-broadcasting-cadc-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack