National Benefit Life Insurance v. Spence
This text of 474 F. App'x 130 (National Benefit Life Insurance v. Spence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Winston L. Spence, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to National Benefit Life Insurance Company and determining that the proceeds of Silvana Sital’s life insurance policy should be divided equally between her sons, Jayson Spence, an adult, and J.S., a minor. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nat’l Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Spence, Case No. 3:11-cv-00031-JPB, 2011 WL 6151540 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 12, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 F. App'x 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-benefit-life-insurance-v-spence-ca4-2012.