National Bank v. Warren

Supreme Court

National Bank v. Warren

96 U.S. 539, 24 L. Ed. 640, 1877 U.S. LEXIS 1694

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 18, 1878

Docket138

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 96 U.S. 539 (National Bank v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Bank v. Warren, 96 U.S. 539, 24 L. Ed. 640, 1877 U.S. LEXIS 1694 (1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Hunt,

after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court'.

This action goes upon the theory that the mere non-resistance of a debtor to judicial proceedings against him, when the debt is due and there is no valid defence to it,-is the suffering *541 and giving a preference under the Bankrupt Act. This theory is expressly repudiated in the .case of Wilson v. City Bank, 17 Wall. 473. It is also held- in that case that the facts that the debtor does not hiinself file the petition in bankruptcy under such circumstances, and that the creditor was aware of the insolvency of the debtor, do not avoid the judgment and execution. In the present case, there is hot proven a single fact or •circumstance tending to show a concurrence or aid on the part of the debtors in obtaining the judgment or securing the payment of the debt. Their only effort was to obtain delay, apparently in the hope of • relief from the • embarrassments which finally overwhelmed them.

The decree of the Circuit Court must be reversed, and that of the District Court, dismissing the bill with costs, affirmed; and it is ■

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Hunt,

after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court'.

This action goes upon the theory that the mere non-resistance of a debtor to judicial proceedings against him, when the debt is due and there is no valid defence to it,-is the suffering *541 and giving a preference under the Bankrupt Act. This theory is expressly repudiated in the .case of Wilson v. City Bank, 17 Wall. 473. It is also held- in that case that the facts that the debtor does not hiinself file the petition in bankruptcy under such circumstances, and that the creditor was aware of the insolvency of the debtor, do not avoid the judgment and execution. In the present case, there is hot proven a single fact or •circumstance tending to show a concurrence or aid on the part of the debtors in obtaining the judgment or securing the payment of the debt. Their only effort was to obtain delay, apparently in the hope of • relief from the • embarrassments which finally overwhelmed them.

The decree of the Circuit Court must be reversed, and that of the District Court, dismissing the bill with costs, affirmed; and it is ■

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 U.S. 539, 24 L. Ed. 640, 1877 U.S. LEXIS 1694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bank-v-warren-scotus-1878.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack