National Bank v. Mills

22 Jones & S. 555
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 30, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 22 Jones & S. 555 (National Bank v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Bank v. Mills, 22 Jones & S. 555 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).

Opinion

Opinion Per Curiam.

Before Sedgwick, J., [556]*556Van Vorst and Freedman, JJ. Judgment and order denying defendants’ motion for new trial on the minutes affirmed, with costs. Order denying defendants’ motion for new trial on the ground of surprise and newly discovered evidence affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Jones & S. 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bank-v-mills-nysuperctnyc-1886.