National Bank v. George
245 A.D. 837
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1935
StatusPublished
This text of 245 A.D. 837 (National Bank v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
National Bank v. George, 245 A.D. 837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
Opinion
In an action to recover upon two promissory notes, order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
245 A.D. 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bank-v-george-nyappdiv-1935.