National Bank v. Carr
This text of 28 S.E. 186 (National Bank v. Carr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
C. G. Holland made his promissory note payable to J. S. Carr and John W. Holland, and said payees endorsed said note for the accommodation of C. G. Holland and in the regular course of business said note became the property of the plaintiff, who brings this action against J. S. Carr alone. The defendant insisted that the administrator of C. G. Holland, and John W. Holland, and one Green to whom C. G. Holland had conveyed some property in trust to indemnify said John W. Holland against, loss by reason of said endorsement, should be made parties defendant before the plaintiff could recover against him, the *114 present defendant. The defendant’s counsel failed to cite any authority in support of his contention, and we are not aware of any.
A note signed by the principal and sureties is a joint and several obligation to pay money, and the owner may sue all or either of the obligors; and endorsers may be sued likewise. Code, Sections 41 and 50. We see no error in the record.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 S.E. 186, 121 N.C. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bank-v-carr-nc-1897.