National Bank of Westchester v. Colasante

Northampton County Court of Common Pleas

National Bank of Westchester v. Colasante

51 Pa. D. & C.2d 733, 1971 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 567

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County

DecidedApril 5, 1971

Docketno. 179

StatusPublished

This text of 51 Pa. D. & C.2d 733 (National Bank of Westchester v. Colasante) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Bank of Westchester v. Colasante, 51 Pa. D. & C.2d 733, 1971 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 567 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

FRANCIOSA, J.,

Defendant seeks to strike off the complaint because the plaintiff, a foreign banking association, has failed to set forth therein that it has registered to do business within the Commonwealth.

A foreign corporation, plaintiff is not required to allege that it is registered as a foreign corporation unless the pleadings as a whole disclose a necessity therefor: Cheerio Toys & Games, Inc. v. Dunbar, 33 Erie 114. From the averments in the complaint, it is apparent that plaintiff has come into Pennsylvania solely to collect a debt under a promissory note executed in New York by defendant, a resident of Pennsylvania. A foreign corporation need not register in Pennsylvania in order to bring an action in assumpsit for the collection of a debt.

The restrictions of section 1014 of the Business Corporation Law are not applicable to such a suit by reason of the specific exclusion provided by section 1001B(8) of the act. See Act of May 5, 1933, P. L. 364, art. X, as amended, 15 PS §2001.

Moreover, we share the view that absence of registration is a defense to be pleaded in the answer: Lever Bros. Co. v. Pugliese, 42 Luz. L. R. 153 (1952).

The preliminary objections in the nature of a motion to strike off plaintiff’s complaint are denied and dismissed.

[735]*735ORDER OF COURT

And now, April 5, 1971, defendant’s preliminary objections are denied and dismissed. Defendant is directed to file an answer to the complaint within 20 days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRANCIOSA, J.,

Defendant seeks to strike off the complaint because the plaintiff, a foreign banking association, has failed to set forth therein that it has registered to do business within the Commonwealth.

A foreign corporation, plaintiff is not required to allege that it is registered as a foreign corporation unless the pleadings as a whole disclose a necessity therefor: Cheerio Toys & Games, Inc. v. Dunbar, 33 Erie 114. From the averments in the complaint, it is apparent that plaintiff has come into Pennsylvania solely to collect a debt under a promissory note executed in New York by defendant, a resident of Pennsylvania. A foreign corporation need not register in Pennsylvania in order to bring an action in assumpsit for the collection of a debt.

The restrictions of section 1014 of the Business Corporation Law are not applicable to such a suit by reason of the specific exclusion provided by section 1001B(8) of the act. See Act of May 5, 1933, P. L. 364, art. X, as amended, 15 PS §2001.

Moreover, we share the view that absence of registration is a defense to be pleaded in the answer: Lever Bros. Co. v. Pugliese, 42 Luz. L. R. 153 (1952).

The preliminary objections in the nature of a motion to strike off plaintiff’s complaint are denied and dismissed.

[735]*735ORDER OF COURT

And now, April 5, 1971, defendant’s preliminary objections are denied and dismissed. Defendant is directed to file an answer to the complaint within 20 days.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 Pa. D. & C.2d 733, 1971 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bank-of-westchester-v-colasante-pactcomplnortha-1971.