National Bank of Watervliet v. . Martin
139 N.E. 755, 235 N.Y. 611, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1337
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that when the note fell due the maker did not tender plaintiff bank $250 and a renewal note for $7,250; no opinion.
Concur: Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Absent: His cock, Ch. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
National Bank of Watervliet v. . Martin, 139 N.E. 755, 235 N.Y. 611, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1337 (N.Y. 1923).
139 N.E. 755 (National Bank of Watervliet v. . Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hudson Private LP v. Creative Wealth Media Finance Corp.
S.D. New York, 2023
Carvel Corporation v. Diversified Management Group, Inc.
930 F.2d 228 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Fein v. Thompson-Starrett Co.
19 Misc. 2d 985 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
South Shore Securities Co. v. Goode
5 Misc. 2d 972 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Petroleum Acceptance Corp. v. Queen Anne Laundry Service, Inc.
265 A.D. 692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)
Colonial Discount Co. v. Rumens
249 A.D. 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Federal Credit Bureau, Inc. v. Zelkor Dining Car Corp.
238 A.D. 379 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
First National Bank v. Hauss
214 A.D. 689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Pellegrino v. First National Bank of Newark
210 A.D. 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)