National Bank of the Republic v. Conlan

99 Mass. 181
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 Mass. 181 (National Bank of the Republic v. Conlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Bank of the Republic v. Conlan, 99 Mass. 181 (Mass. 1868).

Opinion

Chapman, C. J.

Upon the evidence, which consisted of the i ate in suit, and the answers of the plaintiffs’ president and cashier to the defendant’s interrogatories, the jury were correctly instructed to find a verdict for the plaintiffs. For it appeared that the note was indorsed to the plaintiffs by the payees, in the ordinary course of business, before its maturity, and remained their property. The fact that the indorsers had given them security for the note, and had requested them to collect it of [183]*183the maker, and the further fact that they had summoned the indorsers as trustees of the defendant, did not affect their rights as indorsees. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commercial National Bank v. Clarke
62 N.E. 370 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 Mass. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bank-of-the-republic-v-conlan-mass-1868.