National Bank of the Republic v. Agnew

85 P. 116, 12 Idaho 189, 1906 Ida. LEXIS 33
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided March 8, 1906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

STOCKSLAGER, C. J.-

Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal taken from a judgment rendered in the district court of Ada county on the eighth day of March, 1905. It is shown that counsel for appellant was notified to appear in this court and show cause why such motion should not be sustained; [190] and there being no appearance on behalf of appellant, the motion will be sustained, and it is so ordered. Costs to respondent.

Ailshie, J., and Sullivan, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Bank of the Republic v. Agnew, 85 P. 116, 12 Idaho 189, 1906 Ida. LEXIS 33 (Idaho 1906).

85 P. 116 (National Bank of the Republic v. Agnew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ellsworth v. Hill
200 P. 1067 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1921)