National Bank of the Republic v. Agnew
85 P. 116, 12 Idaho 189, 1906 Ida. LEXIS 33
Opinion
Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal taken from a judgment rendered in the district court of Ada county on the eighth day of March, 1905. It is shown that counsel for appellant was notified to appear in this court and show cause why such motion should not be sustained; [190] and there being no appearance on behalf of appellant, the motion will be sustained, and it is so ordered. Costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
National Bank of the Republic v. Agnew, 85 P. 116, 12 Idaho 189, 1906 Ida. LEXIS 33 (Idaho 1906).
85 P. 116 (National Bank of the Republic v. Agnew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ellsworth v. Hill
200 P. 1067 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1921)