National Bank of Hopewell v. Carson
This text of 108 S.E. 388 (National Bank of Hopewell v. Carson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The controversy on trial in the Superior Court narrowed itself principally to the question as to whether the plaintiff was a holder in due course (C. S., 3033) of the note sued'on, under the doctrine announced in Bank v. Exum, 163 N. C., 199, and Worth v. Feed Co., 172 N. C., 342. This fact having been established in plaintiff’s favor by the jury’s answer to the first issue, we think the exceptions appearing in the record must be overruled. The case presents no new point, or issue, which would seem to merit an extended discussion.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 S.E. 388, 182 N.C. 763, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bank-of-hopewell-v-carson-nc-1921.