National Bank of Detroit v. Wayne Oakland Bank, Ray M. Gidney, Comptroller of the Currency v. Wayne Oakland Bank

Sixth Circuit

National Bank of Detroit v. Wayne Oakland Bank, Ray M. Gidney, Comptroller of the Currency v. Wayne Oakland Bank

249 F.2d 445

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 31, 1957

Docket13210_1

StatusPublished

This text of 249 F.2d 445 (National Bank of Detroit v. Wayne Oakland Bank, Ray M. Gidney, Comptroller of the Currency v. Wayne Oakland Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Bank of Detroit v. Wayne Oakland Bank, Ray M. Gidney, Comptroller of the Currency v. Wayne Oakland Bank, 249 F.2d 445 (6th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

249 F.2d 445

NATIONAL BANK OF DETROIT, Appellant,
v.
WAYNE OAKLAND BANK, Appellee.
Ray M. GIDNEY, Comptroller of the Currency, Appellant,
v.
WAYNE OAKLAND BANK, Appellee.

No. 13209.

No. 13210.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

October 31, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Detroit; Arthur F. Lederle, Judge.

Dickinson, Wright, Davis, McKean & Cudlip, Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

Hill, Lewis, Andres, Granse, Goodrich & Adams, Detroit, Mich., Brownell, Gault & Andrews, Flint, Mich., for appellee.

John G. Laughlin, Atty. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (George Cochran Doub, Asst. Atty. Gen., Fred W. Kaess, U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., and Melvin Richter, Atty. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for Comptroller of Currency.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of Judge Lederle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

249 F.2d 445

NATIONAL BANK OF DETROIT, Appellant,
v.
WAYNE OAKLAND BANK, Appellee.
Ray M. GIDNEY, Comptroller of the Currency, Appellant,
v.
WAYNE OAKLAND BANK, Appellee.

No. 13209.

No. 13210.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

October 31, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Detroit; Arthur F. Lederle, Judge.

Dickinson, Wright, Davis, McKean & Cudlip, Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

Hill, Lewis, Andres, Granse, Goodrich & Adams, Detroit, Mich., Brownell, Gault & Andrews, Flint, Mich., for appellee.

John G. Laughlin, Atty. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (George Cochran Doub, Asst. Atty. Gen., Fred W. Kaess, U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., and Melvin Richter, Atty. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for Comptroller of Currency.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of Judge Lederle.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 F.2d 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bank-of-detroit-v-wayne-oakland-bank-ray-m-gidney-comptroller-ca6-1957.