National Bank of Delaware County v. Fenton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

National Bank of Delaware County v. Fenton

55 A.D.2d 805, 390 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15605

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 805 (National Bank of Delaware County v. Fenton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Bank of Delaware County v. Fenton, 55 A.D.2d 805, 390 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15605 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered July 12, 1976 in Delaware County, which enjoined defendant, pendente lite, from interfering with the plaintiff’s removing a vault door and attachments from premises owned by the defendant, and from interfering with any reasonable means plaintiff may employ to effect the removal of said door from said premises. Inasmuch as it appears that the plaintiff has already proceeded to remove the vault door and attachments from the demised premises, the present appeal has been rendered moot. The controverted issues concerning whether or not the removal of the vault door and attachments violated the terms of the lease should be determined in the plenary action. Appeal dismissed sua sponte as moot, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered July 12, 1976 in Delaware County, which enjoined defendant, pendente lite, from interfering with the plaintiff’s removing a vault door and attachments from premises owned by the defendant, and from interfering with any reasonable means plaintiff may employ to effect the removal of said door from said premises. Inasmuch as it appears that the plaintiff has already proceeded to remove the vault door and attachments from the demised premises, the present appeal has been rendered moot. The controverted issues concerning whether or not the removal of the vault door and attachments violated the terms of the lease should be determined in the plenary action. Appeal dismissed sua sponte as moot, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 805, 390 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bank-of-delaware-county-v-fenton-nyappdiv-1976.