National Bank of Commerce v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

National Bank of Commerce v. Baldwin

160 N.W. 1033, 135 Minn. 482, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 564

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 29, 1916

DocketNos. 20,041—(177)

StatusPublished

This text of 160 N.W. 1033 (National Bank of Commerce v. Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Bank of Commerce v. Baldwin, 160 N.W. 1033, 135 Minn. 482, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 564 (Mich. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover on a promissory note made by the defendant to the Kissel Kar Company, and sold and indorsed by it to the plaintiff. [483]*483There was a verdict for the plaintiff and the defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The only material issue was whether the plaintiff was the owner. The evidence sustains the finding of the jury that it was and there were no errors at the trial.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover on a promissory note made by the defendant to the Kissel Kar Company, and sold and indorsed by it to the plaintiff. [483]*483There was a verdict for the plaintiff and the defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The only material issue was whether the plaintiff was the owner. The evidence sustains the finding of the jury that it was and there were no errors at the trial.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 N.W. 1033, 135 Minn. 482, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bank-of-commerce-v-baldwin-minn-1916.