National Bank of Canada v. Skydell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

National Bank of Canada v. Skydell

181 A.D.2d 645, 581 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 181 A.D.2d 645 (National Bank of Canada v. Skydell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

National Bank of Canada v. Skydell, 181 A.D.2d 645, 581 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered February 25, 1991, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs, only with respect to defendant Skydell. That part of the appeal [646]*646involving the other defendants is stayed pending bankruptcy proceedings.

Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3213 was properly denied for failure to provide sufficient time in the notice of motion for defendants to respond. (4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac 3213.02; see also, Ross Bicycles v Citibank, 149 AD2d 330, 331.) Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered February 25, 1991, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs, only with respect to defendant Skydell. That part of the appeal [646]*646involving the other defendants is stayed pending bankruptcy proceedings.

Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3213 was properly denied for failure to provide sufficient time in the notice of motion for defendants to respond. (4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac 3213.02; see also, Ross Bicycles v Citibank, 149 AD2d 330, 331.) Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D.2d 645, 581 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bank-of-canada-v-skydell-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack