National Bank of Athens v. Shackelford

208 F. 677, 125 C.C.A. 575, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1727
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 29, 1913
DocketNo. 2,548
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 208 F. 677 (National Bank of Athens v. Shackelford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Bank of Athens v. Shackelford, 208 F. 677, 125 C.C.A. 575, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1727 (5th Cir. 1913).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence in this case tends strongly to show that, although the mortgage given by the bankrupt to the appellant was for a valid consideration and effective as between the parties thereto, the same by understanding, if not agreement, was withheld from record, so as not to affect the.mortgagor’s credit; and we therefore concur with the trial judge in his disposition of the case.

The decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rankin v. Cox
71 F.2d 56 (Eighth Circuit, 1934)
Jeggle v. Mansur
17 F.2d 729 (Ninth Circuit, 1927)
Crothers v. Steele
10 F.2d 793 (Fourth Circuit, 1926)
Twentieth St. Bank v. Sharitz
296 F. 24 (Fourth Circuit, 1924)
Hawkins v. Dannenberg Co.
253 F. 529 (Fifth Circuit, 1918)
Manders v. Wilson
235 F. 878 (Ninth Circuit, 1916)
Covington v. Brigman
210 F. 499 (E.D. North Carolina, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 F. 677, 125 C.C.A. 575, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-bank-of-athens-v-shackelford-ca5-1913.