National Bank of Athens v. Shackelford

Fifth Circuit

National Bank of Athens v. Shackelford

208 F. 677, 125 C.C.A. 575, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1727

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 29, 1913·No. No. 2,548·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence in this case tends strongly to show that, although the mortgage given by the bankrupt to the appellant was for a valid consideration and effective as between the parties thereto, the same by understanding, if not agreement, was withheld from record, so as not to affect the.mortgagor’s credit; and we therefore concur with the trial judge in his disposition of the case.

The decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The evidence in this case tends strongly to show that, although the mortgage given by the bankrupt to the appellant was for a valid consideration and effective as between the parties thereto, the same by understanding, if not agreement, was withheld from record, so as not to affect the.mortgagor’s credit; and we therefore concur with the trial judge in his disposition of the case.

The decree appealed from is affirmed.

National Bank of Athens v. Shackelford, 208 F. 677, 125 C.C.A. 575, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1727 (5th Cir. 1913).

Pincite

208 F. 677 (National Bank of Athens v. Shackelford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related