National Bank and Loan Company v. Carr
189 U.S. 426, 23 S. Ct. 513, 47 L. Ed. 881, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1368
Opinion
NATIONAL BANK AND LOAN COMPANY
v.
CARR.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued with No. 166 and by the same counsel.
MR. JUSTICE HOLMES:
This case is similar in substance, pleading and argument to the foregoing, with the additional fact that the president of the bank acted as the confidential adviser of the defendant in error and did not reveal to her that the bonds belonged to the bank or that he was on both sides of the transaction and interested against her. As soon as she found out that the bank was the seller she repudiated the sale.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
National Bank and Loan Company v. Carr, 189 U.S. 426, 23 S. Ct. 513, 47 L. Ed. 881, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1368 (1903).
189 U.S. 426 (National Bank and Loan Company v. Carr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hasbrouck v. Rymkevitch
25 A.D.2d 187 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
G. H. Crawford Co. v. Dixon
22 F. Supp. 636 (E.D. South Carolina, 1938)
Wendt v. Fischer
154 N.E. 303 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)
Ruvenacht v. German-American Bank
212 Ill. App. 68 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)