National Ass'n of State Utility Consumer Advocates v. Federal Communications Commission
468 F.3d 1272, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 28849
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 3, 2006·No. No. 05-11682·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Upon consideration of the petitions for panel rehearing filed by the Federal Communications Commission and the Interve-nors-Respondents, the opinion filed in this case on July 31, 2006, and published at 457 F.3d 1238, is modified in one respect. The final sentence of the opinion is deleted, and in its place the following is inserted:
Because the Communications Act allows the states to regulate line item billing for wireless services, we GRANT the petitions for review filed by the State Consumer Advocates and the State Utility Regulators, VACATE the preemption ruling set forth in the Declaratory Ruling in the Second Report and Order, and REMAND the case to the Commission.
In all other respects, the petitions for panel rehearing are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
National Ass'n of State Utility Consumer Advocates v. Federal Communications Commission, 468 F.3d 1272, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 28849 (11th Cir. 2006).
468 F.3d 1272 (National Ass'n of State Utility Consumer Advocates v. Federal Communications Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schnall v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
171 Wash. 2d 260 (Washington Supreme Court, 2011)
Schnall v. AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
259 P.3d 129 (Washington Supreme Court, 2011)
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Farris
542 F.3d 499 (Sixth Circuit, 2008)
Peck v. Cingular Wireless, LLC
535 F.3d 1053 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Micronet, Inc. v. Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission
866 N.E.2d 278 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2007)