National American Bank Of New Orleans v. Bankers International Insurance Company
This text of 386 F.2d 216 (National American Bank Of New Orleans v. Bankers International Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
386 F.2d 216
NATIONAL AMERICAN BANK OF NEW ORLEANS
v.
BANKERS INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY Limited, General Mutual, Inc., and Seymour L. Rosenfield, Seymour L. Rosenfield, Appellant.
No. 16548.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued October 19, 1967.
Decided November 1, 1967.
Malcolm H. Waldron, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Walter R. Milbourne, Obermayer, Rebmann, Maxwell & Hippel, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
Before HASTIE, FREEDMAN and SEITZ, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
The issue in this case, a civil action on a promissory note, is whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a twenty-four hour continuance.
In asking for the continuance the appellant stated that he was discharging his attorney because of dissatisfaction with the attorney's requested fee and his manner of handling the case. The request for a continuance came after a jury had been selected and witnesses had appeared to testify in a case already four years old. Moreover, the trial judge was persuaded and stated that the request for a continuance was "not in good faith". We find no abuse of discretion.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
386 F.2d 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-american-bank-of-new-orleans-v-bankers-international-insurance-ca3-1967.