National Airlines, Inc. v. Tax Assessor

30 Fla. Supp. 112
CourtCircuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County
DecidedApril 19, 1968
DocketNo. 67-18394
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Fla. Supp. 112 (National Airlines, Inc. v. Tax Assessor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Airlines, Inc. v. Tax Assessor, 30 Fla. Supp. 112 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1968).

Opinion

HAROLD B. SPAET, Circuit Judge.

This cause came on to be heard on the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. In this cause there are a number of issues, one of which is the validity of the guidelines, “Aircraft - Commercial” promulgated by the comptroller of the state of Florida and approved by the state budget commission. It is agreed by counsel for the respective parties that if the guidelines are valid the remaining issues are moot and it is unnecessary to resolve them. This is true because it is admitted in the record that the airline has filed and paid the 1967 taxes on the basis of an amended return which is consistent with the guidelines. Counsel for both sides agreed before the court that the issue as to the validity of the guidelines is ripe for determination in a summary judgment proceeding.

The court has considered the pleadings, the affidavits submitted by all parties, the admissions by all parties and the answers to interrogatories and concludes that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact with respect to the validity of the guidelines and that the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

[113]*113The statutes (§192.31, Florida Statutes, and §200.03, Florida Statutes) make it abundantly clear that supervisory jurisdiction in the area of tangible personal property taxes is vested in the comptroller of the state of Florida. The Supreme Court has also made this clear. See Burns v. Butscher, Fla., 187 So.2d 594. §192.31, Florida Statutes, is the critical statute. Under it the guidelines, promulgated by the comptroller of the state of Florida and approved by the state budget commission, are presumptively valid and the burden is cast upon a county tax assessor to overcome the presumption by a preponderance of the evidence.

The court has carefully reviewed the record in this cause including the affidavits and exhibits submitted by the defendants (other than the comptroller) and concludes that the defendants have failed to overcome the presumption.

Accordingly, the court finds that the guidelines, “Aircraft - Commercial” promulgated by the comptroller of the state of Florida and approved by the state budget commission are lawful and valid.

Having reached this conclusion it follows that the 1967 tax assessment of Dade County against the plaintiff is void, nugatory and illegal and of no force and effect; it being recognized by the court that the plaintiff has already filed an amended return and paid the taxes for 1967 in accordance with the guidelines.

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the county taxing officials are hereby enjoined and restrained from enforcing in any manner whatsoever the Dade County 1967 tangible personal property tax assessment which has been the subject of this litigation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burns v. Butscher
187 So. 2d 594 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Fla. Supp. 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-airlines-inc-v-tax-assessor-flacirct11mia-1968.