National Advertising Company v. NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE & REALTY COMPANY, INC.

177 S.E.2d 510, 122 Ga. App. 481, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 914
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 22, 1970
Docket45521
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 177 S.E.2d 510 (National Advertising Company v. NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE & REALTY COMPANY, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Advertising Company v. NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE & REALTY COMPANY, INC., 177 S.E.2d 510, 122 Ga. App. 481, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 914 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

Eberhardt, Judge.

1. Exhibits attached to a petition control over its general allegations. Gaines v. Sheldon Simms Co., 119 Ga. App. 870 (169 SE2d 126); Gilham v. Stamm & Co., 117 Ga. App. 846 (162 SE2d 248); Williams v. Appliances, Inc., 91 Ga. App. 608 (4) (86 SE2d 632); Spiegel v. Hays, 103 Ga. App. 293, 297 (119 SE2d 123); J. G. T., Inc. v. Brunswick Corp., 119 Ga. App. 719 (1) (168 SE2d 847). Solemn admissions in judicio as made in the pleadings are conclusive against the party making them, unless formally withdrawn from the pleadings (Wood v. Claxton, 199 Ga. 809 (1) (35 SE2d 455)), and a party to a suit will not be allowed to disporove an admission made in his pleadings, unless it has been withdrawn from the record. Head v. Lee, 203 Ga. 191 (8) (45 SE2d 666). Consequently defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted where plaintiff brought suit against the corporate defendant, doing business under a trade name, "upon an account which is now due, copy of which is hereto attached, marked 'Exhibit A’ and made a part of this petition by reference thereto,” and where the statement of the account attached to the complaint shows the debtor to be an individual doing business. under the trade name. Williams v. Appliances, Inc., 91 Ga. App. 608 (4), supra; Gilham v. Stamm & Co., 117 Ga. App. 846, supra; Gaines v. Sheldon Simms Co., 119 Ga. App. 870, supra. Cf. Lamas Company, Inc. v. Baldwin, 120 Ga. App. 149 (169 SE2d 638).

2. Defendant’s remaining contentions need not be considered.

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mansell 400 Associates, L.P. v. Entex Information Services, Inc.
519 S.E.2d 46 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Fudge v. Weissinger
411 S.E.2d 62 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Lawyers Co-Operative Publishing Co. v. Huff
234 S.E.2d 842 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Jackson v. Jordan
228 S.E.2d 606 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Tri-State Culvert Manufacturing, Inc. v. Crum
228 S.E.2d 403 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Townsend
220 S.E.2d 14 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Warrior Constructors, Inc. v. E. C. Ernst Co.
195 S.E.2d 261 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Perkins v. P. L. W., Inc.
191 S.E.2d 482 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 S.E.2d 510, 122 Ga. App. 481, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-advertising-company-v-north-american-insurance-realty-company-gactapp-1970.